Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The purpose of this journal publication is to spread conceptual thoughts or ideas and research results that have been achieved in the field of education. Writing forms favor the reader's ease to see the applied research methods, processing and data analysis, discussion of the main theories underlying, and recommendations submitted based on The results of the study.

Focus:

1. Research on education

2. Study Theory on education

Scope :

1. Development and implemenation of learning models

2. Development of teaching materials

3. Learning Media

4. Policy Analysis of Education

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every article is published in the Edutama Journal of Education through a double-blind peer-reviewed process by peer-reviewers of Edutama Journal. The submitted article is reviewed by the editorial team as the initial process. The editorial team will establish the feasibility of the content, focus, and methodology in the article. The article is then sent to one reviewer in several Blind Reviews positions. The reviewer's notes are then sent back to the author in accordance with journal writing standards. The revised manuscript decision will be re-evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Then, the editor's decision in the final meeting will be communicated to the author. EditorJournal Penddikan Edutamabers responsible for determining which articles should be published. The validation of these works and of interest to researchers and readers should always encourage such decisions. The editor may be guided by the editorial policy board of the journal and the limit by law to enforce related to defamation, copyright and plagiarism (plagiarism). The editor may speak with other editors or assessment teams in this arrangement of decisions.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Author Fee

Article Submission: 

0.00 (IDR)

Fast-Track Review:

0.00 (IDR)

Article Publication/Article Processing Charges (APCs):

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs.

300.0000 (IDR) / USD. 23,- / EUR. 19,-

Payments includes:

- Printing Costs (2 Copies)

- Shipping Costs (Indonesia) 

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) is a peer-reviewed electronic national journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the editorial Board, the peer-reviewers­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer-reviewers, the publisher and the society.  

LPPM IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro as publisher of Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions

The editor of Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Peer reviewers assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse her/himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper

 

Plagiarism Policy

"PLAGIARISM" can occur in two forms: 1) author(s) intentionally copy someone else’s work and claim it as their own, or 2) author(s) copy her or his own previously published material either in full or in part, without providing appropriate references - also called as "self-plagiarism" or "duplicate publication".

Plagiarism before publication 
Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) Journals will judge any case of plagiarism on its own merits. If plagiarism is detected, either by the editors, peer reviewers or editorial staff at any stage before publication of a manuscript - before or after acceptance, during editing or at page proof stage, we will alert the author(s), asking her or him to either rewrite the text or quote the text exactly and to cite the original source. If the plagiarism is extensive - that is, if at least 30% of the original submission is plagiarized - the article may be rejected and the author's institution/employer notified.

When is plagiarism check done? 
Every manuscript submitted for publication to any journal published by Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) is checked for plagiarism after submission and before being sent to an editor for editorial review.

How is plagiarism check done? 
Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) uses PlagScan Software to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts. PlagScan is an entirely browser-based web service that verifies the authenticity of documents. 

Plagiarism

It may happen that the manuscript is not freely accessible to article indexing services due to restrictions by programmers, journals or publishers; or it is available on the journal website but not yet indexed by article indexing services. In such cases when plagiarism check is done the content of the manuscript being checked cannot be compared to the original manuscript due to restrictions and plagiarism will not be detected.

Plagiarism Declaration

Every author in the Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) is required to complete the plagiarism-free statement. And sent along with manuscript by uploading additional files in open journal system or by emailing to lppm@ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id.

Please download plagiarism declaration on this link, and please submit alongside with the manuscript on OJS or by emailing to lppm@ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id.

*) The plagiarism policy in the Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) is adapted and modified from Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama (JPE) http://www.edoriumjournals.com/plagiarism-policy-edorium-journals.php