SOLVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PROBLEM IN DELIVERING ENGLISH PRESENTATION THROUGH 3-P TECHNIQUE

Nadif Ulfia

Abstract


Abstract: Solving the Students’ Speaking Problem in Delivering English Presentation Through 3-P Technique. The aims of this study were to (1) identify whether and to what extent 3-P Technique can improve the students’ speaking competence in delivering presentation;(2) describe the teaching and learning when 3-P technique is implemented in English class. This research was conducted at the eleventh grades of MAN 1 Bojonegoro. The subjects of the research were the teacher and the students in the academic year 2016/2017. This study applied 3 cycle action research. In collecting the data, the researcher used observations through field notes, video recording, questionnaire and interview. To analyze the quantitative data, the researcher applied descriptive statistics. Besides, to analyze qualitative data, the researcher applied constant comparative method as suggested by Garner. The findings shows that: (1) 3-P Technique can improve students’ speaking competence in delivering presentation in terms of students achievement, fluency, pronunciation, ability to express their opinions, arguments, and ideas using appropriate vocabulary and grammatical form, using appropriate body language, voice control, gesture, and eye contact; and (2) 3-P technique can improve classroom situation in terms of increasing students’ motivation and participation, creating live teaching atmosphere, and increasing teacher motivation.

Key words: Speaking, 3 P technique, Action research

Abstrak: Memecahkan Masalah Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa dalam Menyampaikan Presentasi Berbahasa Inggris Melalui Teknik 3-P. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk (1) mengidentifikasi dan mengetahui sejauh mana teknik 3-P dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara para siswa dalam menyampaikan sebuah presentasi; (2) mendeskripsikan kegiatan pembelajaran dalam penerapan teknik 3-P dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada kelas sebelas MAN 1 Bojonegoro. Subyek  penelitian ini adalah guru dan para siswa pata tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan 3 siklus penelitian tindakan kelas. Dalam mengumpulan data, peneliti menggunakan teknik observasi melalui catatan lapangan, rekaman video, kuesioner dan wawancara. Untuk menganalisis data kuntitatif, peneliti menggunakan teknik deskiptif statistic, sedangkn untuk menganalisis data kulitatif, peneliti menggunakan metode konstan komparatif oleh Garner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) teknik 3-P dapat meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam berbicara khususnya dalam melakukan sebuah presentasi dalam hal prestasi belajar siswa, kefasihan, pengucapan, dan kemampuan untuk mengemukakan opini, argumentasi dan ide menggunakan kosakata yang tepat, susunan gramatikal, dan bahasa tubah yang tepat, control suara, kontk mata. (2) teknik 3-P dpat meningkatkan kondisi kelas dalam hal meningkatkan motivasi dan partisispasi siswa, menciptakan atmosfir kelas yang lebih aktif, dan meningkatkan motivasi guru dalam mengajar.

Kata kunci: Berbicara, Teknik 3-P, Penelitian tindkan kelas.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi dkk. 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Bailay, Brian. 1982. Effective Language (A Foundation Course in Communication).Cambridge: Campus Publishing and J. M. & M. T. O’Reilly Pty Ltd.

Brown, Douglas H. 1994. Teaching by Principles. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, Douglas H. 2003. Language Assessment (Principles and Classroom Practices). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Bukart, Grace Stoval. Teaching Speaking. Available at: http://www.colostate.edu.com.

Byrne, Donn. 1986. Teaching Oral English. England: Longman Group Limited.

Comfort, J. (1995). Effective presentations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elliot, John. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Ellis, M. & O'Driscoll, N. (1992). Giving presentations. London: Longman.

Engleberg, Isa N. 1994. The Principles of Public Presentation. New York: Harper Collins.

Goering, Laura. 2003. Planning Students Presentation. New York: Carleton College.

Harmer, J. & Arnold, J. (1978). Advanced speaking skills. Harlow: Longman.

Hughes, Arthur. 1989. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kayfetz, J.L & Smith, M.E.F. (1992). Speaking Effectively: Strategies for Academic Interaction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Kayfetz, J & Stice, R. (1987). Academically Speaking. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Kenny, Peter. 1983. A Handbook of Public Speaking. Bristol: Adam Hilger, Ltd.

Lynch, T. & Anderson, K. (1992). Study speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mills, E Geoffrey.____. Action Research (A Guide For The Teacher I). Columbus, Ohio: Merril, an imprint of Prentice Hall.

Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology. England: Prentice Hall International Ltd.

Osborn, M. and S. Osborn. 1988. Public Speaking. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Reinhart, S. M. (2002). Giving Academic Presentations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Richards, C Jack. 2001. Approach and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rignall, M. & Furneaux, C. (1997). Speaking. London: Longman.

The Mcgraw Center.2007. Teaching Oral Presentation Skills to Undergraduates. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ur, Penny. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching ( Practice and Theory ).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weir, Cyril J. 1998. Communicative Language Testing. London: Prentice Hall Europe




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v4i1.41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats