Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa PGSD UNY melalui Model Tipe Small Group Discussion

Anantama Dewantoro, Ali Mustadi

Abstract


Abstract

The purpose of the research is to improve the ability to understand the concept of UNY PGSD students by applying Small Group Discussion learning methods. This research is classroom action research. The research use the Kemmis & Mc.Taggart design. The subject in this research are 38 students of class 2B PGSD UNY. The research’s object is the ability to understand the concept. Data collection techniques gained through tests and observations. The conclusion of Small Group Discussion method is able to improve the conceptual understanding of UNY class 2B PGSD students.


Abstrak

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa PGSD UNY dengan menerapkan metode pembelajaran Small Group Discussion. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas. Penelitian ini menggunakan Desain penelitian ini menggunakan disain Kemmis & Mc.Taggart. Subjek penelitian meliputi 38 mahasiswa kelas 2B PGSD UNY.. Objek penelitian adalah kemampuan pemahaman konsep. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui tes dan observasi.. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa metode Small Group Discussion mampu meningkatkan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa PGSD UNY kelas 2B


Keywords


Pemahaman Konsep, Small Group Discussion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2015). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar

Bennett J, Lubben F, Hogarth S, Campbell B. (2004). A systematic review of the use of small-group discussions in science teaching with students aged 11-18, and their effects on students’ understanding in science or attitude to science. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

Brewer, E. W. (2007). 13 Proven ways to get your message accros; the essential reference for teachers, trainers, presenters, and speaker. In 13 Proven Ways to Get Your Message Accros; The Essential Reference fo Teachers, Trainers, Presenters, and Speaker. California: Corwin Press, 225-234

Choe, S. W. T., & Drennan, P. M. (2001). Analyzing scientific literature using a jigsaw group activity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 328-30.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2008. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.

Hasibuan & Moedjiono. 2000. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Halley, Jean; Heiserman, Courtney; Felix, Victoria & Eshleman, Amy. 2013. Students Teaching Students: A Method for Collaborative Learningm, 1(3), 1-20.

Herawati, Oktiana Dwi Putra. 2010. “Pengaruh pembelajaran Problem Posing terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Pendidikan IPS SD Mahasiswa Kelas PGSD UAD”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Vol.4, No.1, Juni 2010.

Huda, Miftahul. 2013. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Ismail. 2008. Strategi Pembelajaran Agama Islam Berbasis PAIKEM. Semarang: RaSail Media Group.

Kato, Yoshitaka. 2016. What Do We Want Small Group Activities For? Voices from EFL Teachers in Japan. TESL-EJ, 19(4), 1-15.

Kaylene C. Williams and Caroline C. Williams. 2011. “Five key ingredients for improving student motivation”. Research in Higher Education Journal, 165-174

Melvin L. Silberman. 2004. Active Learning: 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nusa media.

Mills, D., & Alexander, P. (2013). Small Group Teaching: A Toolkit for Learning. Higher Education. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy.

Perkins, D. V., & Saris, R. N. (2001). A ‘jigsaw classroom’ technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28(2), 111-113. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_09

Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Raja, N., & Saeed, A. (2012). The effectiveness of group work and pair work for students of English at undergraduate level in public and private sector colleges. Interdiciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, 4(5), 155-163.

Sagala, S. (2006). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjana, Nana. 2005. CBSA dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Taniredja, Tukiran dkk. 2011. Model – Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Zakiyah Darajat, dkk. 2001. Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v6i2.322

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats