Pedagogical Shift Through Computational Thinking: Reflections of Pre-Service Indonesian Language Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v13i1.5169Abstract
Computational Thinking (CT) is one of the approaches in learning that can be used to train students in solving complex problems into simpler ones so that they can be solved more effectively. Research on the effectiveness of CT in learning has been widely conducted, but reflective research that explores the experiences of prospective language teachers has not been widely found. This study aims to reveal the reflections of prospective Indonesian language teachers when implementing the Computational Thinking (CT) approach in the learning process. This study uses a qualitative approach with a reflective-narrative study design. The data sources in this study are 19 prospective language teachers who are currently participating in education and training organized by a private university in Indonesia. Based on thematic analysis of the results of participant reflections, four main themes were found, namely (1) interesting experiences in implementing CT, (2) challenges and failures faced, (3) changes in mindset and learning strategies, and (4) improving the quality of learning. The results of the study show that although the implementation of CT presents cognitive challenges, the use of CT is able to form systematic mindsets, encourage self-evaluation, and improve the quality of learning design and implementation. This study recommends strengthening practice-based and reflection-based CT training in prospective teacher education.
References
Agustina, D. W., Suwandayani, B. I., & Rahmawati, N. I. (2025). Differentiated Learning Strategies to Create A Diverse Learning Space. Journal of Practice Learning and Educational Development, 5(2), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.58737/jpled.v5i2.473
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Ayasrah, S., Obeidat, M., Katatbeh, Q., Aljarrah, A., & Al-Akhras, M.-A. (2023). Practicing creative thinking and its relation to academic achievement. Creativity Studies, 16(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.14661
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Psikolojide tematik analizin kullanımı. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/0.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c.2s.17m
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 1, 25.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.
Butera, F., Batruch, A., Autin, F., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., & Pulfrey, C. (2021). Teaching as social influence: Empowering teachers to become agents of social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15(1), 323–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/SIPR.12072
Chakraborty, P. (2024). Computer, Computer Science, and Computational Thinking: Relationship between the Three Concepts. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1), 5044787. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5044787
Dhakal, B. (2024). Differentiated Instruction: Tailoring Learning for Diverse Learners. 40, 167–176.
Dreer-Goethe, B. (2025). The impact of mentor support and high-quality connections on student teachers’ psychological safety and engagement during practicum. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1499749. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1499749
Dumas, D., Forthmann, B., & Alexander, P. (2024). Using a model of domain learning to understand the development of creativity. Educational Psychologist, 59(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2291577
Dwivedi, R. K., Bisen, S., Yadav, M., & Yadav, A. (2024). Coding and Computational Thinking: Empowering Students for the Digital Age. In Navigating Innovative Technologies and Intelligent Systems in Modern Education (pp. 10–24). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5370-7.ch002
Ericsson, K. A. (2020). Towards a science of the acquisition of expert performance in sports: Clarifying the differences between deliberate practice and other types of practice. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1744909
Fiori, M., Fischer, S., & Barabasch, A. (2022). Creativity is associated with higher well-being and more positive COVID-19 experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 194, 111646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111646
Heritage, M. (2021). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.
Isaksson Persson, H., & Pears, A. (2023). Framing Computational Thinking and Digital Competence in Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004687912_006
Juškevičienė, A., Stupurienė, G., & Jevsikova, T. (2021). Computational thinking development through physical computing activities in STEAM education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAE.22365
Kizi, D. B. O., & Ugli, M. K. S. (2020). Roles of teachers in education of the 21st century. Science and Education, 1(3), 554–557.
Krakowski, A., Greenwald, E., Roman, N., Morales, C., & Loper, S. (2023). Computational Thinking for Science: Positioning coding as a tool for doing science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21907
Macnamara, Brooke N, Hambrick, David Z, & Oswald, Frederick L. (2014). Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535810
Manion, H. K., Dyck, T., Thackeray, S., & Shah-Preusser, N. (2020). Teaching Innovation Through Collaborative and Team-Based Learning. In Enhancing Learning Design for Innovative Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 43–56). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2943-0.CH003
Mondal, D. (2023). Metacognitive Awareness and its relation to academic performance among learners: a review paper. International Journal of Research and Review (Baroda), 10(7), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230786
Mukhtoralieva, M. A. (2025). Interactive Educational Methods in Teaching Pedagogical Theory. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 6(01), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-06-01-02
Narciss, S., & Alemdag, E. (2025). Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12716
Natiqi, S. E. (2024). The Role of Motivation in the Batter Learning of Students. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 4(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.4.2.12
Nuzzaci, A. (2024). Incorporating Computational Thinking into Education: From Teacher Training to Student Mastery. Journal of Education And Training, 1, 70–97. https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v11i2.21942
Ramilo, J., Ting, M., & Pub, A. (2025). Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction, Level of Engagement and Academic Performance of Students with Diverse Learning Needs in an Inclusive Classroom in SDO Calamba City. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 06, 1406–1415. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.2.1406-1415
Rodriguez-Largacha, M. J., García-Flores, F. M., Fernandez-Sanchez, G., Fernandez-Heredia, A., Millan, M. A., Martinez, J. M., Vilardaga, I., & Bernaldo, M. O. (2015). Improving student participation and motivation in the learning process. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(1), 4014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000209
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Safi’i, I., Tarmini, W., Hikmat, A., & Gusti Yanti, P. (2022). Competency achievement indicators in Indonesian high school electronic school books: Overview of the development of creative-innovative thinking aspects. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 8(2 SE-Articles), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v8i2.21304
Saravanan, V., Daniel, M., & Nazeer, K. P. (2022). Curriculum for Education 4.0: A Design Thinking Approach. In Industry 4.0 Technologies for Education (pp. 257–274). Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003318378-16
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Sirianansopa, K. (2024). Evaluating students’ learning achievements using the formative assessment technique: a retrospective study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06347-5
Solomon, C., Harvey, B., Kahn, K., Lieberman, H., Miller, M. L., Minsky, M., Papert, A., & Silverman, B. (2020). History of Logo. Proc. ACM Program. Lang., 4(HOPL). https://doi.org/10.1145/3386329
Sortwell, A., Trimble, K., Ferraz, R., Geelan, D. R., Hine, G., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Carter-Thuiller, B., Gkintoni, E., & Xuan, Q. (2024). A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on the Impact of Formative Assessment on K-12 Students’ Learning: Toward Sustainable Quality Education. In Sustainability (Vol. 16, Issue 17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826
Šumonja, M. (2023). Computational thinking in education-epistemology, pedagogy and politics. Sociologija, 11, 5. https://doi.org/10.2298/soc220401005s
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.
Vassallo, D., & Busuttil, L. (2023). Integrating computational thinking into classroom practice: a case study. TO BE OR NOT TO BE A GREAT EDUCATOR, 12, 600. https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.40
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wang, H., & Lehman, J. D. (2021). Using achievement goal-based personalized motivational feedback to enhance online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-021-09940-3
Wells, J. (2023). 33 Years of the JTE: Visioning Forward. Journal of Technology Education, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.5
Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Hambrusch, S., & Sands, P. (2016). Expanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education, 26(4), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418
Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591
Yang, Z., & Hung, I. W. (2021). Creative thinking facilitates perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 278. https://doi.org/10.1037/PSPA0000259
Zak-Doron, I., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2024). Teachers’ roles in facilitating, delimiting, and balancing student participation rights: The case of democratic (open) schools’ disciplinary procedures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 142, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104528
Zimmerman, B. J. (2010). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
